I confess:
For the last 4 weeks or so, I have been DVR’ing Boston Legal, new episodes and reruns…I also confess to have watched them after wife and kid go to bed. I confess I am watching liberal garbage, but I find one particular aspect of the show compelling, thus I watch. It is ok, because I discovered this aspect by accident, therefore lessening my culpability. So I have been watching to enjoy one particular aspect. I confess that each time I watch it I know I am going to be offended and I accept that and generally find it not worth mentioning.
However last night’s (Monday) first run episode is worthy of comment. Basic premise of the episode is one of the lawyers who basically is a loon, though portrayed as a lovable loon, throws a muffin at somebody then knocks the guy out and it is liberating due to his being bullied as a child…I digress.
The important part concerned a 15 year old Chinese immigrant girl who had been in this country 3 years and sought the representation of the #1 raging leftist attorney (there are many) to obtain a “judicial bypass” to allow her to slaughter her unborn child without the consent of her parent. The episode proceeds from there. Through the episode I learned that slaughtering the child is not only necessary, it’s patriotic. You can wrap yourself in the flag while killing the child. I had no idea, essentially the personal liberty offered by the United States that this child finds so compelling is the ability to kill her child. Apparently it is lost on said child that she could have obtained said slaughter much easier in a more enlightened Euro-kingdom for example.
I further learned that while slaughtering the unborn is the sine qua non of liberty, the essence of womanhood, and generally to be encouraged, it is however not all of those things when you are slaughtering the unborn to avoid having female children. The issue of infanticide in China (mind you it is only infanticide in China or India-in the U.S. it is choice and other cute terms that avoid reality) is then covered and basic facts about Chinese slaughter is laid out for the viewer. When you boil down this element of the plot line you learn that slaughtering the unborn is good and all-American, unless you are slaughtering females only to slaughter females. Then the slaughter is bad.
Executing one of my client’s is the worlds great injustice, executing the unborn generally-a sign of an enlightened society, executing baby girls because they are girls well that is just evil but not evil enough to make the leftist examine the entire slaughter culture.
Other random things I learned, when a leftist character, expresses qualms about the idea killing baby girls and dare say killing infants in general, that character is treated with kid gloves, thoughtful and considered. The only thing that passes as a conservative character continues to be a buffoon. I should say conservative character other than characters who pass in and out of particular episodes, like cops, D.A.’s, conservative judges, particularly conservative U.S. SCT judges who aren’t likable buffoons, but the pinnacle of evil. They are also generally rendered impotent, speechless and exposed as the evil-doers they are by the raging leftist attorney’s who we all like.
Noble leftist attorney
Likable, but reactionary, buffoonish conservative lawyer, who may have mental defects to boot